作者:Zhang, Lu Doris
Gordon, C. ChatGPT is the fastest growing app in the history of web applications. Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/cindygordon/2023/02/02/chatgpt-is-the-fastest-growing-ap-in-the-history-of-web-applications/ (2023).
Rooney, K. OpenAI tops 400 million users despite DeepSeek’s emergence. CNBC https://www.cnbc.com/2025/02/20/openai-tops-400-million-users-despite-deepseeks-emergence.html (2025).
Lim, L. Baidu shares pop after it makes ERNIE Bot, its flagship AI product, free in a bid to catch up to its competition. Fortune https://fortune.com/asia/2025/02/13/baidu-makes-ernie-bot-free-china-ai-shares/ (2025).
Noy, S. & Zhang, W. Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science 381, 187–192 (2023).
Sun, S., Li, A. Z., Foo, M.-D., Zhou, J. & Lu, J. G. How and for whom using generative AI affects creativity: a field experiment. J. Appl. Psychol. (in the press).
What Are the Top 200 Most Spoken Languages? (Ethnologue, 12 May 2025); https://www.ethnologue.com/insights/ethnologue200/
Dave, P. ChatGPT is cutting non-English languages out of the AI revolution. Wired https://www.wired.com/story/chatgpt-non-english-languages-ai-revolution/ (2023).
Huang, K. et al. A survey on large language models with multilingualism: recent advances and new frontiers. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.10936 (2024).
ERNIE-3.5-8K-0205. Baidu https://cloud.baidu.com/doc/WENXINWORKSHOP/s/llsr6hjxo (2024).
Grossmann, I. & Na, J. Research in culture and psychology: past lessons and future challenges. WIRES Cogn. Sci. 5, 1–14 (2014).
Markus, H. R. & Kitayama, S. Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol. Rev. 98, 224–253 (1991).
Na, J. et al. Culture and personality revisited: behavioral profiles and within-person stability in interdependent (vs. independent) social orientation and holistic (vs. analytic) cognitive style. J. Pers. 88, 908–924 (2020).
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I. & Norenzayan, A. Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychol. Rev. 108, 291–310 (2001).
Varnum, M. E. W., Grossmann, I., Kitayama, S. & Nisbett, R. E. The origin of cultural differences in cognition: the social orientation hypothesis. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 19, 9–13 (2010).
Triandis, H. C. Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1989: Cross-cultural Perspectives (ed. Berman, J. J.) 41–133 (Univ. Nebraska Press, 1990).
Chen, Y.-R., Brockner, J. & Katz, T. Toward an explanation of cultural differences in in-group favoritism: the role of individual versus collective primacy. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 75, 1490–1502 (1998).
Chen, Y.-R., Brockner, J. & Chen, X.-P. Individual–collective primacy and ingroup favoritism: enhancement and protection effects. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 38, 482–491 (2002).
Lu, J. G., Jin, P. & English, A. S. Collectivism predicts mask use during COVID-19. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2021793118 (2021).
Yoo, B., Donthu, N. & Lenartowicz, T. Measuring Hofstede’s five dimensions of cultural values at the individual level: development and validation of CVSCALE. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 23, 193–210 (2011).
Li, H. Z., Zhang, Z., Bhatt, G. & Yum, Y.-O. Rethinking culture and self-construal: China as a Middle Land. J. Soc. Psychol. 146, 591–610 (2006).
Nisbett, R. E. The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently… and Why (Simon and Schuster, 2004).
Nisbett, R. E. & Miyamoto, Y. The influence of culture: holistic versus analytic perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 467–473 (2005).
Morris, M. W. & Peng, K. Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 67, 949–971 (1994).
Norenzayan, A., Smith, E. E., Kim, B. J. & Nisbett, R. E. Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning. Cogn. Sci. 26, 653–684 (2002).
Peng, K. & Nisbett, R. E. Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. Am. Psychol. 54, 741–754 (1999).
Ji, L.-J., Nisbett, R. E. & Su, Y. Culture, change, and prediction. Psychol. Sci. 12, 450–456 (2001).
Masuda, T. & Nisbett, R. E. Attending holistically versus analytically: comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 81, 922–934 (2001).
Binz, M. & Schulz, E. Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2218523120 (2023).
Yamaguchi, S. Collectivism among the Japanese: a perspective from the self. In Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications (eds Kim, U. et al.) 175–188 (Sage Publications, 1994).
Aron, A., Aron, E. N. & Smollan, D. Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 63, 596–612 (1992).
Choi, I., Nisbett, R. E. & Norenzayan, A. Causal attribution across cultures: variation and universality. Psychol. Bull. 125, 47–63 (1999).
Kitayama, S., Ishii, K., Imada, T., Takemura, K. & Ramaswamy, J. Voluntary settlement and the spirit of independence: evidence from Japan’s “northern frontier”. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 91, 369–384 (2006).
Choi, I. & Nisbett, R. E. Cultural psychology of surprise: holistic theories and recognition of contradiction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 79, 890–905 (2000).
Demszky, D. et al. Using large language models in psychology. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 2, 688–701 (2023).
Hofmann, V., Kalluri, P. R., Jurafsky, D. & King, S. AI generates covertly racist decisions about people based on their dialect. Nature 633, 147–154 (2024).
Sclar, M., Choi, Y., Tsvetkov, Y. & Suhr, A. Quantifying language models’ sensitivity to spurious features in prompt design or: how I learned to start worrying about prompt formatting. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.11324 (2024).
Shanahan, M., McDonell, K. & Reynolds, L. Role play with large language models. Nature 623, 493–498 (2023).
Yam, K. C., Tan, T., Jackson, J. C., Shariff, A. & Gray, K. Cultural differences in people’s reactions and applications of robots, algorithms, and artificial intelligence. Manag. Organ. Rev. 19, 859–875 (2023).
Ostroski, K. & Leong, A. Culture, biases, and artificial intelligence. Medium https://medium.com/slalom-data-ai/culture-biases-and-artificial-intelligence-2fb0c0c1095a (2024).
Adilazuarda, M. F. et al. Towards measuring and modeling “culture” in LLMs: a survey. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.15412 (2024).
Greenfield, P. M. The changing psychology of culture from 1800 through 2000. Psychol. Sci. 24, 1722–1731 (2013).
Grossmann, I. & Varnum, M. E. W. Social structure, infectious diseases, disasters, secularism, and cultural change in America. Psychol. Sci. 26, 311–324 (2015).
Han, S. & Shavitt, S. Persuasion and culture: advertising appeals in individualistic and collectivistic societies. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 30, 326–350 (1994).
Grossmann, I. et al. AI and the transformation of social science research. Science 380, 1108–1109 (2023).
Wach, K. et al. The dark side of generative artificial intelligence: a critical analysis of controversies and risks of ChatGPT. EBER 11, 7–30 (2023).
Brinkmann, L. et al. Machine culture. Nat. Hum. Behav. 7, 1855–1868 (2023).
Choudhury, M. Generative AI has a language problem. Nat. Hum. Behav. 7, 1802–1803 (2023).
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J. & Minkov, M. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (McGraw Hill, 2010).
Qin, X. et al. Artificial Intelligence Quotient (AIQ). Preprint at SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4787320 (2024).
Schmelzer, R. Beyond misinformation: the impact of AI in journalism and news. Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/ronschmelzer/2024/09/21/beyond-misinformation-the-impact-of-ai-in-journalism--news/ (2024).
Kasneci, E. et al. ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learn. Individ. Diff. 103, 102274 (2023).
Gelfand, M. J. et al. Differences between tight and loose cultures: a 33-nation study. Science 332, 1100–1104 (2011).
Lu, J. G., Benet-Martínez, V. & Wang, L. C. A socioecological–genetic framework of culture and personality: their roots, trends, and interplay. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 74, 363–390 (2023).
Markus, H. R. & Kitayama, S. Cultures and selves: a cycle of mutual constitution. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 5, 420–430 (2010).
Eliot, L. The crucial ways that religion and generative AI ChatGPT are crossing fateful faithful paths. Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/lanceeliot/2023/05/10/the-crucial-ways-that-religion-and-generative-ai-chatgpt-are-crossing-fateful-faithful-paths/ (2023).
Brislin, R. W. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 1, 185–216 (1970).