英语轻松读发新版了,欢迎下载、更新

Cultural tendencies in generative AI

2025-06-20 12:44:29 英文原文

作者:Zhang, Lu Doris

References

  1. Gordon, C. ChatGPT is the fastest growing app in the history of web applications. Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/cindygordon/2023/02/02/chatgpt-is-the-fastest-growing-ap-in-the-history-of-web-applications/ (2023).

  2. Rooney, K. OpenAI tops 400 million users despite DeepSeek’s emergence. CNBC https://www.cnbc.com/2025/02/20/openai-tops-400-million-users-despite-deepseeks-emergence.html (2025).

  3. Lim, L. Baidu shares pop after it makes ERNIE Bot, its flagship AI product, free in a bid to catch up to its competition. Fortune https://fortune.com/asia/2025/02/13/baidu-makes-ernie-bot-free-china-ai-shares/ (2025).

  4. Noy, S. & Zhang, W. Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science 381, 187–192 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sun, S., Li, A. Z., Foo, M.-D., Zhou, J. & Lu, J. G. How and for whom using generative AI affects creativity: a field experiment. J. Appl. Psychol. (in the press).

  6. What Are the Top 200 Most Spoken Languages? (Ethnologue, 12 May 2025); https://www.ethnologue.com/insights/ethnologue200/

  7. Dave, P. ChatGPT is cutting non-English languages out of the AI revolution. Wired https://www.wired.com/story/chatgpt-non-english-languages-ai-revolution/ (2023).

  8. Huang, K. et al. A survey on large language models with multilingualism: recent advances and new frontiers. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.10936 (2024).

  9. ERNIE-3.5-8K-0205. Baidu https://cloud.baidu.com/doc/WENXINWORKSHOP/s/llsr6hjxo (2024).

  10. Grossmann, I. & Na, J. Research in culture and psychology: past lessons and future challenges. WIRES Cogn. Sci. 5, 1–14 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Markus, H. R. & Kitayama, S. Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol. Rev. 98, 224–253 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Na, J. et al. Culture and personality revisited: behavioral profiles and within-person stability in interdependent (vs. independent) social orientation and holistic (vs. analytic) cognitive style. J. Pers. 88, 908–924 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I. & Norenzayan, A. Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychol. Rev. 108, 291–310 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Varnum, M. E. W., Grossmann, I., Kitayama, S. & Nisbett, R. E. The origin of cultural differences in cognition: the social orientation hypothesis. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 19, 9–13 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Triandis, H. C. Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1989: Cross-cultural Perspectives (ed. Berman, J. J.) 41–133 (Univ. Nebraska Press, 1990).

  16. Chen, Y.-R., Brockner, J. & Katz, T. Toward an explanation of cultural differences in in-group favoritism: the role of individual versus collective primacy. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 75, 1490–1502 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen, Y.-R., Brockner, J. & Chen, X.-P. Individual–collective primacy and ingroup favoritism: enhancement and protection effects. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 38, 482–491 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lu, J. G., Jin, P. & English, A. S. Collectivism predicts mask use during COVID-19. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2021793118 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Yoo, B., Donthu, N. & Lenartowicz, T. Measuring Hofstede’s five dimensions of cultural values at the individual level: development and validation of CVSCALE. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 23, 193–210 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Li, H. Z., Zhang, Z., Bhatt, G. & Yum, Y.-O. Rethinking culture and self-construal: China as a Middle Land. J. Soc. Psychol. 146, 591–610 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nisbett, R. E. The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently… and Why (Simon and Schuster, 2004).

  22. Nisbett, R. E. & Miyamoto, Y. The influence of culture: holistic versus analytic perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 467–473 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Morris, M. W. & Peng, K. Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 67, 949–971 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Norenzayan, A., Smith, E. E., Kim, B. J. & Nisbett, R. E. Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning. Cogn. Sci. 26, 653–684 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Peng, K. & Nisbett, R. E. Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. Am. Psychol. 54, 741–754 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ji, L.-J., Nisbett, R. E. & Su, Y. Culture, change, and prediction. Psychol. Sci. 12, 450–456 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Masuda, T. & Nisbett, R. E. Attending holistically versus analytically: comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 81, 922–934 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Binz, M. & Schulz, E. Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2218523120 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Yamaguchi, S. Collectivism among the Japanese: a perspective from the self. In Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications (eds Kim, U. et al.) 175–188 (Sage Publications, 1994).

  30. Aron, A., Aron, E. N. & Smollan, D. Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 63, 596–612 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Choi, I., Nisbett, R. E. & Norenzayan, A. Causal attribution across cultures: variation and universality. Psychol. Bull. 125, 47–63 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kitayama, S., Ishii, K., Imada, T., Takemura, K. & Ramaswamy, J. Voluntary settlement and the spirit of independence: evidence from Japan’s “northern frontier”. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 91, 369–384 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Choi, I. & Nisbett, R. E. Cultural psychology of surprise: holistic theories and recognition of contradiction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 79, 890–905 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Demszky, D. et al. Using large language models in psychology. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 2, 688–701 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hofmann, V., Kalluri, P. R., Jurafsky, D. & King, S. AI generates covertly racist decisions about people based on their dialect. Nature 633, 147–154 (2024).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Sclar, M., Choi, Y., Tsvetkov, Y. & Suhr, A. Quantifying language models’ sensitivity to spurious features in prompt design or: how I learned to start worrying about prompt formatting. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.11324 (2024).

  37. Shanahan, M., McDonell, K. & Reynolds, L. Role play with large language models. Nature 623, 493–498 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Yam, K. C., Tan, T., Jackson, J. C., Shariff, A. & Gray, K. Cultural differences in people’s reactions and applications of robots, algorithms, and artificial intelligence. Manag. Organ. Rev. 19, 859–875 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ostroski, K. & Leong, A. Culture, biases, and artificial intelligence. Medium https://medium.com/slalom-data-ai/culture-biases-and-artificial-intelligence-2fb0c0c1095a (2024).

  40. Adilazuarda, M. F. et al. Towards measuring and modeling “culture” in LLMs: a survey. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.15412 (2024).

  41. Greenfield, P. M. The changing psychology of culture from 1800 through 2000. Psychol. Sci. 24, 1722–1731 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Grossmann, I. & Varnum, M. E. W. Social structure, infectious diseases, disasters, secularism, and cultural change in America. Psychol. Sci. 26, 311–324 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Han, S. & Shavitt, S. Persuasion and culture: advertising appeals in individualistic and collectivistic societies. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 30, 326–350 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Grossmann, I. et al. AI and the transformation of social science research. Science 380, 1108–1109 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wach, K. et al. The dark side of generative artificial intelligence: a critical analysis of controversies and risks of ChatGPT. EBER 11, 7–30 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Brinkmann, L. et al. Machine culture. Nat. Hum. Behav. 7, 1855–1868 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Choudhury, M. Generative AI has a language problem. Nat. Hum. Behav. 7, 1802–1803 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J. & Minkov, M. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (McGraw Hill, 2010).

  49. Qin, X. et al. Artificial Intelligence Quotient (AIQ). Preprint at SSRN https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4787320 (2024).

  50. Schmelzer, R. Beyond misinformation: the impact of AI in journalism and news. Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/ronschmelzer/2024/09/21/beyond-misinformation-the-impact-of-ai-in-journalism--news/ (2024).

  51. Kasneci, E. et al. ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learn. Individ. Diff. 103, 102274 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Gelfand, M. J. et al. Differences between tight and loose cultures: a 33-nation study. Science 332, 1100–1104 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lu, J. G., Benet-Martínez, V. & Wang, L. C. A socioecological–genetic framework of culture and personality: their roots, trends, and interplay. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 74, 363–390 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Markus, H. R. & Kitayama, S. Cultures and selves: a cycle of mutual constitution. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 5, 420–430 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Eliot, L. The crucial ways that religion and generative AI ChatGPT are crossing fateful faithful paths. Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/lanceeliot/2023/05/10/the-crucial-ways-that-religion-and-generative-ai-chatgpt-are-crossing-fateful-faithful-paths/ (2023).

  56. Brislin, R. W. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 1, 185–216 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

关于《Cultural tendencies in generative AI》的评论


暂无评论

发表评论

摘要

ChatGPT is reported to be the fastest-growing web application in history, surpassing 400 million users despite competition from DeepSeek. Baidu's ERNIE Bot has been made free as a strategic move to compete with rivals. Research indicates that generative AI significantly impacts productivity and creativity. However, concerns arise about non-English language inclusion in the AI revolution. Studies also explore cultural influences on cognitive styles and social behaviors across different societies, highlighting the need for culture-aware AI development.