2025-10-27 07:55:00
由于收入的快速增长和语音识别技术的扩张计划，SoundHound AI 的股价在过去一年中上涨了两倍多。然而，鉴于目前的高估值和持续亏损，人们担心维持这一势头。在汽车和餐饮行业生态系统扩张以及“Vision AI”等新人工智能工具的推动下，到 2027 年，收入预计将以 47% 的复合年增长率增长。尽管有这些增长机会，但由于高成本和收购带来的潜在利润压缩，该公司的盈利能力仍然不确定。鉴于 SoundHound 目前的估值水平和缺乏内部购买，该公司的股票可能会面临近期暴跌。

2025-10-27 06:49:13
OpenAI 首席执行官 Sam Altman 宣布计划为用户推出年龄验证，以访问 ChatGPT 上的色情内容等成人内容。这一决定引发了关于其对用户和整个社会潜在负面影响的争议。批评者认为，提供此类内容会使有害的性行为正常化，并对现实世界的关系产生负面影响。Altman 坚持认为责任在于用户，而不是 OpenAI，他强调选择自由，但没有承认他的平台在塑造用户行为和期望方面的作用。专家警告称，这些变化会导致暴力和虐待行为增加，并呼吁采取更严格的监管以保护公众健康和道德。

2025-10-27 05:00:15
站点组件加载失败，可能是由浏览器扩展、网络问题或浏览器设置引起的。检查互联网连接、禁用广告拦截器或使用其他浏览器。

2025-10-27 05:00:05
站点组件加载失败，可能是由于浏览器扩展、网络问题或浏览器设置造成的。检查互联网连接、禁用广告拦截器或切换浏览器。

2025-10-27 01:00:00
Wei Khjan Chan 是一位在马来西亚拥有超过 18 年经验的会计师，他学习了 Vibe 编码（使用人工智能编写代码和构建应用程序），以领先于工作自动化威胁。尽管缺乏技术背景，陈还是使用人工智能工具开发了一款用于报销费用的网络应用程序。他主张在会计行业内更广泛地采用人工智能培训，以解决人们对会计兴趣下降的问题，同时需求仍然很高。（陈向《商业内幕》讲述了他在氛围编码方面的经验，强调了在使用人工智能时迭代步骤和清晰指令的重要性。）

2025-10-27 01:00:00
澳大利亚竞争监管机构起诉微软，指控其在集成人工智能工具 Copilot 后误导客户为 Microsoft 365 支付更高的价格。个人计划的年度订阅价格上涨 45% 至 159 澳元，家庭计划的年度订阅价格上涨 29% 至 179 澳元。监管机构称，微软未能明确告知用户没有 Copilot 的更便宜的“经典”计划，该计划仅在取消过程中才透露。ACCC 向 Microsoft 寻求处罚、消费者赔偿、禁令和费用。

2025-10-27 00:06:52
Google AI Studio 引入了新的“vibe 编码”体验，可简化人工智能应用程序的创建。用户可以描述他们的应用创意，AI Studio 使用 Gemini 模型自动处理复杂的设置过程。更新的应用程序库提供了灵感，注释模式允许对现有应用程序进行直观的更改。这些功能旨在减少开发人员和非编码人员将想法变成功能性人工智能应用程序的障碍。

2025-10-24 04:41:25
由于导演桑迪普·雷迪·万加 (Sandeep Reddy Vanga) 的受欢迎，普拉巴斯首次主演的《精神》(Spirit) 中饰演一名警察，引起了极大的关注。在普拉巴斯生日那天，一段意想不到的音频片段被发布，其中讲述了普拉巴斯在监狱中的情景，该片段立即在网上疯传。有趣的是，据报道，该剪辑是使用 Pappu 开发并得到 Prabhas 支持的新配音软件由人工智能生成的，从而消除了演员手动录制对话的需要。这项技术已经在另一部主要电影中使用，并且可能以其效率和速度彻底改变电影制作。

2025-10-24 00:37:00
特朗普政府敦促监管机构加快数据中心接入电网的进程，提议采用 60 天的审查期，而不是目前长达数年的流程。此举旨在支持特朗普总统的人工智能雄心并促进与中国的竞争。该提议出台后，独立电力生产商的股价在盘前交易中上涨。然而，这一变化可能会面临各州的抵制，这些州正在应对电力需求增加以及由此导致的水电费上涨。根据拟议的规则，数据中心需要包括新的发电厂或同意在高需求时期减少使用，以便进行快速审查。

2025-10-23 23:18:44
Federal judge mulls sanctions against attorney for AI use in Kluwe defamation case A federal judge questioned attorney William J. Becker Jr. about sanctions for misusing AI in legal briefs, rejecting monetary penalties and calling it "unacceptable" to cite non-existent cases. Becker apologized for the mistake but faced criticism from Chris Kluwe's attorney Daniel Sasse, who pointed out 22 incorrect citations. The judge also heard arguments on dismissing a defamation lawsuit against writer Chris Epting by former NFL player Chris Kluwe, with discussions围绕着克里斯·克鲁夫被解雇的原因及其言论自由权的保护展开。法官表示将在后续时间发布裁决。 A federal judge Thursday asked an attorney defending writer Chris Epting in a defamation lawsuit filed by former NFL punter and Huntington Beach resident Chris Kluwe what sanctions he thinks he deserves for misusing artificial intelligence in legal briefs. “I don’t believe monetary sanctions are appropriate,” attorney William J. Becker Jr. told U.S. District Judge Fred Slaughter during a hearing in Santa Ana. “So zero is the answer?” Slaughter replied. “Zero is the answer,” Becker said. Becker argued that the “humiliation” alone in being admonished for the misstep was punishment enough. Slaughter said it was “unacceptable” to submit court briefs with fictitious cases for arguments on precedent. “There’s no excuse for this,” Slaughter said. Becker apologized for the misstep, saying he was “fairly ashamed by it” and blaming the error on a lack of resources for his nonprofit Freedom X Law. “I failed my client,” he said. “I stand before you filled with humility.” He said the work he submitted was “all done in haste,” because, “I have zero resources. [And] in this case, I’m up against a big, big law firm.” Slaughter called AI a game of telephone, saying it was incumbent on attorneys to double check anything the tool yields with the original sources. The judge said he does not use artificial intelligence, adding, “I rely on me” and his personal research of the various laws and legal books as reference. Daniel Sasse, an attorney for Kluwe, said Becker submitted legal briefs citing “three cases that didn’t exist at all,” indicating Becker did not check the work produced by the artificial intelligence at all. Sasse counted 22 examples of incorrect citations to legal precedence. Slaughter also heard arguments from attorney Mark Bresee of the Huntington Beach Union High School District on a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, citing legal immunity. Chris Kluwe was arrested at a Huntington Beach City Council meeting in February when he protested the council’s intention to create a MAGA plaque for the library. (Courtesy of Protect Huntington Beach video ) Sasse argued Kluwe was fired from his job as a coach at Edison High School following criticism from Epting and others on social media regarding Kluwe’s civil disobedience arrest at a Huntington Beach City Council meeting in February, where he protested a plaque at the city library that proclaimed “Make America Great Again.” School officials cited a civility policy that Kluwe “had never seen,” Sasse said. Kluwe’s attorney said even though Kluwe was an at-will employee, he still had 1st Amendment rights. Bresee said the school’s policy was one “you’ll see all over the state.” “It appears the plaintiff has a long history of activism for civil rights issues for years,” Slaughter said of Kluwe’s speaking out, dating back to his public support of legalizing same-sex marriage in 2012. And yet Edison officials did not discipline or fire him before this year, the judge noted. Sasse said his client was told he was being fired because of the positions he was taking against Huntington Beach decisions. Epting is accused in the defamation suit of framing a social media post of the former punter’s as espousing violence, which Kluwe denied. Bresee said the fact that Kluwe was never fired before due to his activism would show that he was discriminated against this year for exercising his free speech rights. Bresee also argued Kluwe was the one who went public with the reasons for his termination, so he can’t make a liberty interest claim now. Sasse argued Kluwe reposted Epting’s comments to make the case his statement was “false and defamatory.” Slaughter said he would issue ruling at a later time.